Client v. Lawyer
Legal Ethics and Malpractice in Texas
James McCorquodale
A M Lawyers
4015 Main Street, Suite 200
Dallas, Texas 75226-1231
Tel. 214-712-4472
Fax 815-572-9448
theamlawyers.com
Add this blog!
Syndicate
Posts Atom 1.0
Comments Atom 1.0
Posts RSS 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
Podcasts RSS 2.0
Subscribe
Recent Posts
Appellate Court Affirms Jury's Rejection of Fraud Claim Based on Firm's Brochure and Website
Monday, April 21, 2008
Pro se litigant’s brief and conclusory statements provide not a scintilla of evidence to support her legal malpractice claim.
Saturday, September 01, 2007
Legal malpractice suit barred by limitations where client was aware of facts early on; Professional services exemption barred DTPA claim.
Saturday, September 01, 2007
Trial court's order denying presuit deposition of lawyer not appealable where suit against lawyer is contemplated.
Saturday, September 01, 2007
Expert witness had nothing of substance to add; No negligence in not objecting to a correct jury charge.
Saturday, September 01, 2007
Untimely expert affidavit fatal to legal malpractice claim.
Sunday, August 19, 2007
Creditor’s committee cannot disqualify attorneys representing a debtor where the client-debtor is satisfied with the legal services provided to it by the law firm.
Sunday, August 19, 2007
Anti-fracturing and anti-assignment rules land one-two punch against claims.
Sunday, August 19, 2007
Counsel in mandamus proceeding must alert appellate court of changes in sworn facts.
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Six lawyer mistakes which require expert testimony in a malpractice action.
Thursday, May 31, 2007
Category Archives
Announcements (1)
Arbitration (1)
Arce claims (3)
Attorney as witness (1)
Bankruptcy (1)
Capacity to Sue (1)
Case within a case (4)
Causation (10)
Damages (2)
Disqualification (3)
DTPA (1)
Experts (5)
Fee Agreements (3)
Fees (3)
Fiduciary Duty (4)
Fraud (1)
Judicial Estoppel (1)
Liability to non-clients (1)
Limitations and Tolling (5)
Personal Jurisdiction (4)
Professional services exemption (1)
Rule 13 (1)
sanctions (1)
Standard of Care (5)
Standing to Sue (2)
Tape Recording (1)
Who can sue (3)
Quick Search
Search only in titles:
Keyword:
Search in:
Title
Title and Contents
Title and Comments
Title, Contents, Comments
Date Range:
1 week
2 weeks
1 month
3 months
All
Advanced Search
Basic Search
Texas Appellate Courts
The Supreme Court of Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals
Courts of Appeals [
PDF Map
]
(Appellate District-City)
1-Houston
|
2-Fort Worth
|
3-Austin
|
4-San Antonio
|
5-Dallas
|
6-Texarkana
|
7-Amarillo
|
8-El Paso
|
9-Beaumont
|
10-Waco
|
11-Eastland
|
12-Tyler
|
13-Corpus Christi
|
14-Houston
Back to Main Page
Client vs. Lawyer: Legal Ethics and Malpractice in Texas: Category Archive for Experts
Expert witness had nothing of substance to add; No negligence in not objecting to a correct jury charge.
Posted by Sandy McCorquodale at
9/1/2007 6:24 PM
Expert’s affidavit insufficient to support summary judgment against lawyers on legal malpractice claims.
Posted by Sandy McCorquodale at
3/25/2007 11:24 AM
|
Add Comment
Expert testimony necessary to establish causation in claim alleging attorney’s negligence in defending suit on a note.
Posted by Sandy McCorquodale at
11/5/2006 11:25 PM
|
Add Comment
Is the role of expert witnesses opining on settlement values in Arce fee-forfeiture claims to provide evidence of motive?
Posted by Sandy McCorquodale at
10/1/2006 5:02 PM
|
Add Comment
Expert affidavit from attorney insufficient to establish that case-within-a-case would have been won.
Posted by Sandy McCorquodale at
7/8/2006 4:00 PM
|
Add Comment
